According to Vermont

It is lawful to carry a firearm openly or concealed provided the firearm is not carried with the intent or avowed purpose of injuring a fellow man. No permit is needed. 


A right not exercised soon needs permission. Carry on!

My radio personality can beat up your radio personality... he says so!

You know what's amazing... after 10 years of talk radio, I'm starting to listen to music again.

Levin,"blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Beck!"

Savage, "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Rush!"

Rush, "blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah O'Reily!"

Dudes... who are we fighting... each other? Get a grip and a spine.


Really, the only hosts I have not heard are Beck and Hannity trying to rip a new one... in the same side. Why?

WHY?

Because maybe... ego?

This is war. Keep your eyes on the enemy.

I do not agree 100% with any one, even if they claim they are fighting for the cause. They are mere men and women. Human. Trust...         but verify. But the battle at hand is not with each other. If you think it is... what's that saying?... Join or Die!

And      this      battle      is      worth     DIEING FOR!

Read, Listen and Pray! The fight starts with... YOU!

This guy is an idiot!

You know when you go to Drudge in the morning and in the first few headlines Harry Reid's name shows up... The conservative movement grows a little more stronger. Nevada, Nevada, Nevada. Well I guess I can't talk. My state gave you all Pelosi. (PS, that was from the central part of the state).

Ole Harry yesterday... on the senate floor stated that "when men are out of work (no doubt because of the republicans...) they tend to be abusive".

Is this guy an idiot or what?

Wait...

This guy is an idiot!

First thing Harry. Men are not abusive. Regardless of employment, debt, football commercials or any other crap you can come up with. These are not men. They're scum. Even with a job, those of the male chromosome that are abusive, lack the 'balls' to be real men. Scum like taking advantage of those they consider beneath them who don't or can't fight back. Kinda like the current leadership on the Hill.  When they don't get their way they do it anyways and tell us, "It's for your own good".  The thing is... we're learning to fight back and we realize our country is better than this and them. No more abuse.

My concern now...

by Reids' own dribble... I guess many in politics will be abusive starting this November. Personally I would put them all on a watch list and warn their families now.

Mike Huckabee rips CPAC. Who is Huckabee?

 Gov Huckabee skips CPAC 2010 citing "It's not the event it once was."
“CPAC has becoming increasingly more libertarian and less Republican over the last years, one of the reasons I didn’t go this year.”

JUST ANOTHER BITTER OLD GOAT!

Conservative/Libertarians are the only ones who can save this country. Not some retread socialist republican. Our founders stood for Libertarian principals and the constitution. Not the neocon rhetoric stench coming from guys like this (and Romney). Bigger and bigger government they strive for (and have accomplished). Yes todays CPAC is not like the good old days.. that's what got us where we are today. This year there were actually people with their eyes WIDE open and not accepting the same old elephant crap from the establishment!

Sing with me...

"Turn out the lights, the (old Republican) Party's over...

And the new party has just begun!"

Dont Tread on Me!... wait, it's too late. Prepare to be bitten!

CPAC follow up...

CPAC chose Ron Paul... the problem I see with this is... Mitt Romney was second. Can this no better describe the divide in Republican Party. Black and white. Truth is, CPAC is a conservative convention... with republicans attending. Romney, like McCain and Huckabee... they are not conservative. Look at Mitt's state. I live in California and I sure would not consider Massachusetts as an upgrade. BIG GOVERNMENT and ENTITLEMENTS!

If Washington, Jefferson or Adams were running for office today, they would be total outcasts. Wackos. Nutty constitutionalists... LIBERTARIANS?... As insane as that... Ron Paul guy.  EXACTLY!

Welcome to the Revolution!

Ron Paul Wins CPAC Presidential Straw Poll

Crazy... Yes!
But he is a PATRIOT!

The Revolution has begun!!!

Bill of Rights... unless it's raining!

I missed his show, but Bill O'Reily stated that the feral government (I know it's misspelled but I decided to leave it)  has every right to suspend our constitution and the Bill of Rights in case of an emergency.
?
Isn't this the most important time to preserve these rights?

Let's see... a natural disaster happens... no law enforcement available... we are on our own. But keep your mouth shut and turn in any guns you may have...
...
...
Since my son reads this  I will keep it to pg13

HELL NO and JUST TRY!

O'Reily, you Neo Con Ass. You stated on your show that I did see (which will probably be the last for a while) that the feds have every right to do whatever they want to in an emergency. Sorry bub... they don't. They serve us.
They serve us!
He stated the Supreme court can step in to protect us if when the president oversteps his authority. Please. It takes 5 years and 100 lawsuits and a thousand attorneys to even raise an eyebrow. And the Supreme Court is not the final word. Three CO-EQUAL branches.  Spend a little more time reading books than writing them.

He dissed the Oath Keepers. He dissed us as free Americans. And he is an idiot.

It's not the Bill of Suggestions...
it's the Bill of RIGHTS!

and to defend it... 
"we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."

BETTER THAN A THOUSAND

A large group of Taliban soldiers are  moving down a road when they hear a voice call from behind a sand-dune say, "One Marine is better than ten Taliban."

The Taliban commander quickly sends 10 of his best soldiers over the dune whereupon a  gun-battle breaks out and continues for a few minutes, then  silence.

The voice then  calls out, "One Marine is better than a hundred Taliban soldiers."

Furious, the Taliban commander sends his next best 100 troops over the dune and instantly a  huge gun fight commences. After 10 minutes of battle, again  silence.

The Marine voice calls  out, "One Marine is better than a thousand Taliban."

The enraged Taliban commander musters a thousand fighters and sends them over the dune.  Cannon fire, rocket blasts, and machine gun fire rings out as a huge battle rages.

Then silence.

Finally one wounded Taliban fighter crawls back over the dune and with his dying words tells his commander,  "Don't  send any more men, it's a trap. There are two of them."

Feds Warn: Snow Costs Taxpayers $100 Million A Day...

As I see it we will save $1.3 Trillion if Washington closes for the rest of the year. Finally, 'Change' I can believe in. Now lets see if we can shut Sacramento down...

The Dogs of War

A friend at work loaned me a copy of  "The Hurt Locker" about an IED squad in Iraq. Powerful movie. Reinforced my belief on the failure of the US trying to be everything to everyone. We need more drones... for another article later. Anyways I came across this awesome site  "Woman Honor Thyself" with a great story. Read it here.  The Dogs of War

Enough Said

Marbury v Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176; 2 LE
60 (1803) reveals that "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."

Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 491; 86 S Ct 1602; 16 L Ed
2d 694 (1966) reveals that "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no legislation which would abrogate them."

Norton v Shelby County, Tennessee, 118 US 425, 442; 6 S Ct 1121; 30 L Ed 178 (1886) reveals that "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; creates no office. It is as inoperative as though it had never been passed."

West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette, 319 US 624, 638; 63 S Ct 1178; 87 L Ed 1628 (1943) "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no election."

City of Oak Ridge v Diana Ruth Brown (Tenn. Ct. App., Case No. E2004-01574-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 1996620, 19 August 2005 lv app den 2006) reveals that a law is unconstitutional which forbids what the U.S. Constitution allows
 
Last I checked the law of the land is the Constitution and it tells us we have the right to bear arms. If it infringes upon our Constitutional rights, IT IS NOT A LAW and we have no obligation to it.